Re: [PATCH v2011.2] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories
From: Kees Cook
Date: Thu Dec 15 2011 - 02:06:59 EST
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> + ab = audit_log_start(current->audit_context,
>> + GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_AVC);
>
> Hm, is GFP_ATOMIC really necessary here? Why not GFP_KERNEL?
> This is in VFS process context, not in some atomic context that
> has to be careful about allocations, right?
Hm, that's true. I had started from the lsm_audit interface, but had
to expand it, and in the process copied its use of audit_log_start().
But yeah, I don't see a reason it can't be GFP_KERNEL. I'll adjust it.
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
ChromeOS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/