Re: printk() vs tty_io
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Dec 15 2011 - 05:56:25 EST
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:32 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> For lockdep spews do they need to be spewed synchronously - clearly it's
> good if they can be but its possible that they could be buffered ?
This wasn't about lockdep per-se, it all started with me trying to
cleanup printk()'s abuse of lockdep_off()/lockdep_on. Which then grew
into something a little bigger.
I'm fine with dropping the larger goal of making printk() work in all
but NMI context and focus on the initial cleanup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/