Re: [PATCH 1/6] HWPOISON: clean up memory_failure() vs.__memory_failure()
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Dec 15 2011 - 13:11:07 EST
* Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The overall meaning is "land mine seen but not stepped on yet"
> >
> > Perfect message!
>
> How about:
>
> Uncorrected memory error in page 0x%lx ignored
> Rebuild kernel with CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE=y for smarter handling
Yeah, sounds good.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/