linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Jan 03 2012 - 18:48:21 EST
Hi all,
I noticed that the arm-soc tree has merged in the v4l-dvb and the
slave-dma trees today. Is there some good reason for this? It fixes a
few conflicts (but that is not excuse) and there may be dependencies in a
driver on the v4l-dvb tree (but maybe that means that that driver should
be merged via the v4l-dvb tree - it looks like the "at91/drivers" is
based on the v4l-dvb tree, so probably doesn't depend on anything else on
the arm-soc tree).
If nothing else, are you sure that neither of those merged trees will
rebase? You have also just inherited any bugs in those two trees.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature