[PATCH] kmod: Avoid deadlock by recursive kmod call.

[Tetsuo Handa]

I noticed that the system deadlocks if do_execve() request by kmod() triggered
recursive do_execve() request.

An example operation for triggering this deadlock:

  # : > /tmp/dummy
  # chmod 755 /tmp/dummy
  # echo /tmp/dummy > /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug
  # modprobe whatever

Although this patch works for me, I'm not sure that this is a correct fix.
Also, my analysis in the patch description may be wrong. Please check.
--------------------
[PATCH] kmod: Avoid deadlock by recursive kmod call.

call_usermodehelper(UMH_WAIT_EXEC) creates a CLONE_VFORK'ed thread.
The vforked thread may call call_usermodehelper(UMH_WAIT_PROC) from
search_binary_handler() which in turn calls wait_for_completion().

This sequence results in a deadlock because "khelper cannot start processing
call_usermodehelper(UMH_WAIT_PROC) until do_execve() of vforked thread by
call_usermodehelper(UMH_WAIT_EXEC) completes" but "vforked thread cannot
complete do_execve() until call_usermodehelper(UMH_WAIT_PROC) completes".

We need to make sure that do_execve() request by vforked thread does not
trigger call_usermodehelper(UMH_WAIT_PROC or UMH_WAIT_EXEC).

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/kmod.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- linux-3.1.7.orig/kernel/kmod.c
+++ linux-3.1.7/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -428,6 +428,15 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subp
 		retval = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
 	}
+	/*
+	 * We can't call wait_for_completion() if current thread was created
+	 * with CLONE_VFORK flag, or we will deadlock when current thread calls
+	 * request_module() from search_binary_handler().
+	 */
+	if (wait != UMH_NO_WAIT && current->vfork_done) {
+		retval = -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	sub_info->complete = &done;
 	sub_info->wait = wait;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/