Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Tegra30 clockframework

[Peter De Schrijver]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:03:30AM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Peter De Schrijver wrote at Monday, January 02, 2012 8:18 AM:
> > This patchset introduces the tegra30 clockframework. Clocks which require
> > voltage scaling are not included in this version. The implementation doesn't
> > use the generic clock code yet. It's the intention to move to it, once the
> > semantics are fully clarified.
> 
> I'm not particularly familiar with Tegra's clocks, but nothing really
> stood out as wrong with this patch on a quick look-through. It'd be great
> if someone like Colin could look this over.
> 
> A couple thoughts below. You've probably thought about some of these
> already, but I just wanted to make sure:-)
> 
> * Are we following the common clock stuff so we can move over once it's
> ready?
> 

I think we can use the same approach then OMAP4 to convert this to the common
clock stuff.

> * Are Tegra20 and Tegra30 so different we can't re-use any of the code
> in tegra2_clocks.c for Tegra30?
> 

Apart from some small functions (such as clk_measure_input_freq()), it's not
easy to share code between both.

> * The device names in the peripheral clock table might benefit from a
> review to make sure they match tegra2_clocks.c for the drivers we've
> actually upstreamed at least.

Good point. I should check that...

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/