Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle: refactor out cpuidle_enter_state
From: Jean Pihet
Date: Wed Jan 04 2012 - 09:08:12 EST
Hi Colin,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Split the code to enter a state and update the stats into a helper
> function, cpuidle_enter_state, and export it. This function will
> be called by the coupled state code to handle entering the safe
> state and the final coupled state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index 06ce268..1486b3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,34 @@ static void cpuidle_kick_cpus(void) {}
> static int __cpuidle_register_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
>
> /**
> + * cpuidle_enter_state
> + *
> + * enter the state and update stats
> + */
> +int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> + int next_state)
> +{
> + int entered_state;
> + struct cpuidle_state *target_state;
> +
> + target_state = &drv->states[next_state];
> +
> + entered_state = target_state->enter(dev, drv, next_state);
> +
> + if (entered_state >= 0) {
> + /* Update cpuidle counters */
> + /* This can be moved to within driver enter routine
> + * but that results in multiple copies of same code.
> + */
> + dev->states_usage[entered_state].time +=
> + (unsigned long long)dev->last_residency;
> + dev->states_usage[entered_state].usage++;
> + }
> +
> + return entered_state;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * cpuidle_idle_call - the main idle loop
> *
> * NOTE: no locks or semaphores should be used here
> @@ -63,7 +91,6 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> {
> struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices);
> struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_driver();
> - struct cpuidle_state *target_state;
> int next_state, entered_state;
>
> if (off)
> @@ -92,26 +119,14 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - target_state = &drv->states[next_state];
> -
> trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, next_state, dev->cpu);
> trace_cpu_idle(next_state, dev->cpu);
>
> - entered_state = target_state->enter(dev, drv, next_state);
> + entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state(dev, drv, next_state);
>
> trace_power_end(dev->cpu);
> trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
The cpu_idle traces are only present in this function and not in
cpuidle_enter_state. Is that expected? Can all the transitions from
all the cpus get traced that way?
Regards,
Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/