Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Update stable address

[Randy Dunlap]

On 12/09/2011 02:12 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> The Japanese/Korean/Chinese versions still need updating.
> 
> Also, the stable kernel 2.6.x.y descriptions are out of date
> and should be updated as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/HOWTO                         |    4 ++--
>  Documentation/development-process/5.Posting |    8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/HOWTO b/Documentation/HOWTO
> index 81bc1a9..f7ade3b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/HOWTO
> +++ b/Documentation/HOWTO
> @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ versions.
>  If no 2.6.x.y kernel is available, then the highest numbered 2.6.x
>  kernel is the current stable kernel.
>  
> -2.6.x.y are maintained by the "stable" team <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>, and are
> -released as needs dictate.  The normal release period is approximately 
> +2.6.x.y are maintained by the "stable" team <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, and
> +are released as needs dictate.  The normal release period is approximately
>  two weeks, but it can be longer if there are no pressing problems.  A
>  security-related problem, instead, can cause a release to happen almost
>  instantly.
> diff --git a/Documentation/development-process/5.Posting b/Documentation/development-process/5.Posting
> index 903a254..8a48c9b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/development-process/5.Posting
> +++ b/Documentation/development-process/5.Posting
> @@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ copies should go to:
>     the linux-kernel list.
>  
>   - If you are fixing a bug, think about whether the fix should go into the
> -   next stable update.  If so, stable@xxxxxxxxxx should get a copy of the
> -   patch.  Also add a "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx" to the tags within the patch
> -   itself; that will cause the stable team to get a notification when your
> -   fix goes into the mainline.
> +   next stable update.  If so, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx should get a copy of
> +   the patch.  Also add a "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" to the tags within
> +   the patch itself; that will cause the stable team to get a notification
> +   when your fix goes into the mainline.
>  
>  When selecting recipients for a patch, it is good to have an idea of who
>  you think will eventually accept the patch and get it merged.  While it
> 
> 
> 


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/