RE: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device andrelated changes in MM

[leonid.moiseichuk]

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxx] 
>No, please listen to what people, including me, are saying, otherwise your code will be totally ignored.

I tried to sort out all inputs coming. But before doing the next step I prefer to have tests passed. Changes you proposed are strain forward and understandable. 
Hooking in mm/vmscan.c and mm/page-writeback.c is not so easy, I need to find proper place and make adequate proposal.
Using memcg is doesn't not look for me now as a good way because I wouldn't like to change memory accounting - memcg has strong reason to keep caches.

Best Wishes,
Leonid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/