Re: Incorrect uses of get_driver()/put_driver()

From: Sebastian Ott
Date: Tue Jan 10 2012 - 05:18:53 EST


On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:05:41AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:35:09 -0500 (EST)
> > Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > drivers/s390/cio/device.c:1681: drv = get_driver(&cdrv->driver);
> > > drivers/s390/cio/device.c:1687: put_driver(drv);
> > >
> > > Martin, these calls seem to be useless. The calls in ccwgroup.c are
> > > definitely useless; there's no reason to take a reference to a driver
> > > while it's being unregistered, since it can't go away until the
> > > unregistration is finished.
> >
> > The get_driver/put_driver in ccwgroup.c are obviously useless, the caller
> > passed ccwgroup_driver_unregister a ccwgroup_driver reference.
> > I am not so sure about the code in device.c. get_ccwdev_by_busid() gets
> > used e.g. by vmur like this:
>
> It does not matter how it is being used. Either get_ccwdev_by_busid()
> gets a valid driver structure or you already lost. You can not say that
> get_driver() protects anything, since if there is a chance driver can
> disappear it can disappear before we get to executing get_driver() code.
>
> So while you might want to audit callers get/put_driver inside of
> get_ccwdev_by_busid() is utterly useless.

Yes, the caller has to ensure valid driver pointers. We have one offender
here:

[PATCH] zfcp: fops add owner

Set the owner member of zfcp_cfdc_fops, to ensure that the
caller of these functions holds a module reference.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_cfdc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_cfdc.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_cfdc.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@

#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <asm/compat.h>
#include <asm/ccwdev.h>
@@ -249,6 +250,7 @@ static long zfcp_cfdc_dev_ioctl(struct f
}

static const struct file_operations zfcp_cfdc_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = nonseekable_open,
.unlocked_ioctl = zfcp_cfdc_dev_ioctl,
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT



>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/