Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] possible privilege escalation via SG_IO ioctl(CVE-2011-4127)

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/16/2012 02:04 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > Tested on top of 3.2 + Linus's patch to sanitize ioctl return values.
>
> Is that a fixed version of patch at the end of this post:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132578310403616&w=2
> The fix being
>    s/ENOIOCTLCMD/-ENOIOCTLCMD/
> in is_unrecognized_ioctl() ?

Yes.  I cherry-picked it from Linus's tree.

> Also could you post "PATCH v2 3/3 ..." to this list as well so
> we have a complete set?

FWIW, 3/3 only touches LVM.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/