Re: 3.2.0-07927-gc49c41a: s2ram: Device 'machinecheck1' does nothave a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed

[Sergei Trofimovich]

> But the only reason I haven't really jumped into writing such a patch
> is that I would prefer to get the semantics right - adding a dummy
> function is IMO something like working around the rules of the driver-core
> framework just to silence the warning. Hence I feel we should resort
> to it _only_ if there is nothing better we can do about this.

Ah, I see. Will ignore the warning.
Thanks for the detailed explanation!

Sorry for the noise.

-- 

  Sergei

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature