Re: [PATCH 04/11] mm: page_alloc: introduce alloc_contig_range()

From: Michal Nazarewicz
Date: Mon Jan 16 2012 - 07:48:18 EST


On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:01:10 +0100, Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:04:31PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 01:39:05PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>+ /* Make sure all pages are isolated. */
>>+ if (!ret) {
>>+ lru_add_drain_all();
>>+ drain_all_pages();
>>+ if (WARN_ON(test_pages_isolated(start, end)))
>>+ ret = -EBUSY;
>>+ }

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:16:13 +0100, Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Another global IPI seems overkill. Drain pages only from the local CPU
>(drain_pages(get_cpu()); put_cpu()) and test if the pages are isolated.

Is get_cpu() + put_cpu() required? Won't drain_local_pages() work?


drain_local_pages() calls smp_processor_id() without preemption
disabled.

Thanks, I wasn't sure if preemption is an issue.

--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, MichaÅ âmina86â Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/