Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: make signal tracepoints more useful
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Jan 16 2012 - 10:52:06 EST
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 13:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Say if an app relies on the smaller data structure, it sure
> might get surprised by the kernel writing a wider record ...
Ingo,
The kernel does this all the time. We have syscalls that may extend the
data structure. This is a common practice. Any app that depends on a
data structure remaining the same size for no good reason is broken by
design.
Now we are making tracepoints stricter than system calls?
I'm starting to regret adding the whole TRACE_EVENT() interface.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/