Re: [patch v2, kernel version 3.2.1] net/ipv4/ip_gre: Ethernetmultipoint GRE over IP

From: Štefan Gula
Date: Tue Jan 17 2012 - 07:40:24 EST


DÅa 17. januÃra 2012 12:15, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> napÃsal/a:
> Le mardi 17 janvier 2012 Ã 12:00 +0100, Åtefan Gula a Ãcrit :
>
>> >
>> looks good... I am just wondering whether my previous question about
>> the placement of calls for ipgre_tap_bridge_init and
>> ipgre_tap_bridge_fini? Would it be also possible to have this
>> done/fixed when I migrate those inside the ipgre_init and ipgre_fini ?
>> I would like to have much rather identical parts of code with standard
>> bridge code just in case somebody would start doing generalization of
>> bridge code which can be then reused anywhere inside the kernel space
>> - simpler migration process later.
>
> Could you please stop claiming this is the same than bridge ?
>
> There is _one_ exit function per module (ipgre_fini in ip_gre)
>
> You wanted to destroy your kmem_cache only from this __exit function,
> not from the pernet exit function (ipgre_exit_net)
>
>
>
Ok, I will modify that, test that later today and if testing will be
successful, I will provide new version of this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/