Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM / Sleep: Introduce new phases of device suspend/resume

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, January 17, 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:21:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Friday, December 23, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On the request of some driver PM developers, that appears to have been quite
> > > popular lately, this series of patches adds new system suspend/resume (and
> > > hibernation/restore) callbacks to struct dev_pm_ops and makes the PM core
> > > use them during system power transitions.
> > > 
> > > [1/2] - Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices.
> > > [2/2] - Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases.
> > > 
> > > The series is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm tree.
> > > 
> > > These patches have been tested on Toshiba Portege R500 with openSUSE 12.1
> > > without crashing the box in the process, which looks promising.  Also,
> > > they shouldn't actually have any impact on the existing setups other than
> > > adding a very short delay to the system suspend/resume code paths.
> > 
> > The patches have received some more testing since the were first posted and
> > I've added a PM domains patch on top of them:
> > 
> > [3/3] - Make generic PM domains use the new device suspend/resume phases.
> > 
> > The series applies on top of linux-pm/pm-for-linus (although it should
> > apply on top of the current mainline too).
> > 
> > I'm considering these patches as v3.4 material, if there are no objections.
> 
> No objection from me.

Thanks!

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/