Re: [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify

[Pekka Enberg]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That seems like a horrible idea, because there is no guarantee that
> the kernel will continue to use NR_ACTIVE_ANON and NR_ACTIVE_FILE
> internally in the future.
>
> What is exported to userspace must be somewhat independent of the
> specifics of how the kernel implements things internally.

Exactly, that's what I'm also interested in.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/