RE: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface

[Luck, Tony]

> > +	/* TODO(kees): We cannot unload ramoops since pstore doesn't support
> > +	 * unregistering yet.
> > +	 */
>
> Well that sucks.  Is pstore getting fixed?

While it might be useful for developers who have machines that
support multiple back-ends to load & unload - there really isn't
any credible end-user case for it - so it has a very low priority.
Perhaps zero (it would complicate the code for no useful purpose).

Even for development there's a lot of re-booting (after all, pstore
is really about saving the kernel log when the system crashes :-).

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/