Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 (uml)

[Randy Dunlap]

On 01/18/2012 05:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20120118:
> 
> Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.


Building uml on x86_64 gives:

  CC      arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/shared/registers.h:9:0,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h:14,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:20,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:13,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/thread_info.h:53,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/time.h:8,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/timex.h:56,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/sched.h:57,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
                 from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
/next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: error: redefinition of 'regs_return_value'
/next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: note: previous definition of 'regs_return_value' was here



-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/