Re: [PATCH] dmatest: fix merge error resulting in incorrect counthandling
From: Nicolas Ferre
Date: Thu Jan 19 2012 - 03:21:46 EST
On 01/19/2012 01:21 AM, Paul Gortmaker :
> We currently see this warning:
>
> drivers/dma/dmatest.c: In function âdmatest_add_channelâ:
> drivers/dma/dmatest.c:602:28: warning: the omitted middle operand
> in ?: will always be âtrueâ, suggest explicit middle operand [-Wparentheses]
>
> It happens because commit f1aef8b6e6abf32a3a269542f95a19e2cb319f6c
>
> "dmaengine: dmatest: correct thread_count while using multiple thread per channel"
>
> fixed the only two instances of this issue in the code, but then the
> commit 58691d64c44ae41ddf098ecb31e9a994026e3cff "dmatest: add pq support"
> was based on the old (unfixed) code, and so it reintroduced an instance
> of this error. Using git describe, the baseline delta is apparent:
>
> dmatest: correct thread_count v2.6.30-8-gf1aef8b
> dmatest: add pq support v2.6.29-rc8-80-g58691d6
>
> Inspection of f1aef8b and/or the surrounding code leads one to the
> obvious fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> [After creating this patch, I noticed it came up before in the
> lkml archives, but a fix never got applied. At least now the
> real root cause is documented in this commit log.]
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> index 2b8661b..24225f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int dmatest_add_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
> }
> if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ, dma_dev->cap_mask)) {
> cnt = dmatest_add_threads(dtc, DMA_PQ);
> - thread_count += cnt > 0 ?: 0;
> + thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0;
> }
>
> pr_info("dmatest: Started %u threads using %s\n",
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/