Re: [RFC] splitting cgroup.c
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Jan 19 2012 - 07:30:26 EST
Hello, Li.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I agree that splitting is necessary but IMHO splitting usually tends
>> to go too far. Maybe we can split it into two and think about further
>> splitting later on? e.g. internal logic vs. userland interfacing.
>
> This isn't feasible. The feasible way is to split by functionality,
> which I think was the way taken by perf developers.
Eh? Feasible or desirable? How can it be not feasible? Why?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/