Re: [PATCH] arm: irq: Allow for specification of no preallocatedirqs

[Michael Bohan]

On 1/19/2012 3:04 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> No doubt that arch_probe_nr_irqs is doing the wrong thing on ARM, but no
> pre-allocation is not what we want either. We ultimately want
> arch_probe_nr_irqs to return NR_IRQS_LEGACY (16) to reserve IRQ0 (aka
> NO_IRQ) and legacy ISA IRQs. With my series, NR_IRQS is set to
> NR_IRQS_LEGACY for SPARSE_IRQ. You can accomplish the same thing without
> that series by setting .nr_irqs to NR_IRQS for non-DT and to
> NR_IRQS_LEGACY for DT. For platforms to work in single kernel builds,
> they will need to select SPARSE_IRQ.

One issue here is that IRQ_BITMAP_BITS is defined as a function of 
NR_IRQS. Currently, there's a hack in place that arbitrarily tacks on 
8196 bits to the end, giving the max virq supported as 8212 with your 
patches. Unfortunately, the system I'm running on will require higher 
values than that, so this actually breaks me.

It seems like the right solution to this problem is to have the 
allocated_irqs bitmap expandable at runtime. Or perhaps use a different 
data structure to begin with?

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/