Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: tidspbridge: Lindent to drv_interface.c
From: Ramirez Luna, Omar
Date: Mon Jan 30 2012 - 12:25:35 EST
2012/1/23 Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <vjaquez@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> No functional changes.
>
> According to Lindent, the file drv_internface.c had some lines with bad
> indentation.
>
> This commit is the output of Lindent.
Usually lindent tends to do whatever it wants, unless carefully configured...
...
> @@ -342,9 +342,10 @@ static void bridge_recover(struct work_struct *work)
> if (atomic_read(&bridge_cref)) {
> INIT_COMPLETION(bridge_comp);
> while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&bridge_comp,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(REC_TIMEOUT)))
> - pr_info("%s:%d handle(s) still opened\n",
> - __func__, atomic_read(&bridge_cref));
> + msecs_to_jiffies
> + (REC_TIMEOUT)))
Like here, it just split msecs_to_jiffies(REC_TIMEOUT) into 2 lines
making it a little harder to read.
> + pr_info("%s:%d handle(s) still opened\n", __func__,
> + atomic_read(&bridge_cref));
I remember the rule was to break lines as far to the right as
possible, no? Chapter 2 CodingStyle, same for the other similar
changes.
...
> @@ -547,10 +548,9 @@ static int __devexit omap34_xx_bridge_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pr_err("%s: Failed to retrieve the object handle\n", __func__);
> goto func_cont;
> }
> -
Blank line removed?
> #ifdef CONFIG_TIDSPBRIDGE_DVFS
> if (cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&iva_clk_notifier,
> - CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER))
> + CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER))
> pr_err("%s: cpufreq_unregister_notifier failed for iva2_ck\n",
> __func__);
> #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TIDSPBRIDGE_DVFS */
> --
> 1.7.8.3
>
Regards,
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/