Re: [PATCH V1] arm: tegra: dma: not required to move requestor whenstopping.

[Olof Johansson]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 02:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >Laxman Dewangan wrote at Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:11 AM:
> >>It is not require to move the requestor of dma to INVALID
> >>option before stopping dma.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Tested-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I know that Laxman has checked with the HW engineers, and they see no
> >reason to do this. I was originally worried about hung FIFOs preventing
> >an in-progress DMA from completely without the removed code, but according
> >to HW, that isn't a concern.
> >
> Olaf,
> Can it be applied if it is OK to you?

Yep, applied.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/