Re: [PATCH RT 2/2 v4] preempt-rt/x86: Delay calling signals in int3

[Oleg Nesterov]

Damn. Sorry for noise...

On 02/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> +int force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> +	if (in_atomic()) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(t != current))

This is certainly wrong in upstream kernel. It does use force_
this way although it shouldn't imho.

But _probably_ this is fine for rt? We are going to take the mutex,
we shouldn't do this in atomic context. But, once again, I do not
really know what in_atomic() means in rt.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/