Re: [GIT PULL 00/16] perf/core improvements and fixes

[Namhyung Kim]

2012-02-14 2:52 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/13/12 10:48 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2012-02-14 2:23 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> > > On 2/13/12 10:10 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It happened because I used old kernel version that isn't aware of the
> > > > exclude_guest bit. So the check on attr->__reserved_1 in
> > > > core.c::perf_copy_attr() failed and then ended up seeing EINVAL at
> > > > perf_evsel__open().
> > >
> > > comes back to 1aed2671738785e8f5aea663a6fda91aa7ef59b5 again. See
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/234
> >
> > Thanks for the pointer, then I'll wait until the guys figure out what
> > the correct fix is :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
>
> Resetting that default was it. :-)
>
> Does reverting the entire patch fix your problem?
>
> David

Yes, of course.

OK, then I'll start to rework perf target cleanups after reverting it.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/