Re: [PATCH v1] percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op

[Ming Lei]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 13:08 +0800, Ming Lei a écrit :
>
>> Just several warnings, no errors. Also the 5 warnings are introduced
>> by previous commit, sounds nothing to do with motivation of this patch.
>> You may prepare a standalone patch to fix all the code style in this file, :-)
>>
>
> Oh well, I dont use checkpatch but spoke about trailing \
>
> Cant you see them on your screen ?
>
> We had :
>
> #define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op)                           \
> do {                                                                    \
>        unsigned long flags;                                            \
>        local_irq_save(flags);                                          \
>        *__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val;                                 \
>        local_irq_restore(flags);                                       \
> } while (0)
>
>
> You want :
>
> #define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op)                           \
> do {                                                                    \
>        unsigned long flags;                                            \
>        raw_local_irq_save(flags);                                              \
>        *__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val;                                 \
>        raw_local_irq_restore(flags);                                   \
> } while (0)
>
>
> I suggest :
>
> #define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op)                           \
> do {                                                                    \
>        unsigned long flags;                                            \
>        raw_local_irq_save(flags);                                      \
>        *__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val;                                 \
>        raw_local_irq_restore(flags);                                   \
> } while (0)
>
>
> Is it clear now ?

Thanks for your pointing it out.
Yes, I have updated the patch and sent it out.


thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
èº{.nÇ+?·?®?­?+%?Ëlzwm?éb?맲æìr¸?zX§»®w¥?{ayºÊ?Ú?ë,j­¢f£¢·h??àz¹®w¥¢¸¢·¦j:+v?¨?wèjØm¶?ÿ¾«?êçzZ+?ù???Ý¢j"?ú!¶iO?æ¬z·?vØ^¶m§ÿðÃnÆ?àþY&?