[22/28] backing-dev: fix wakeup timer races with bdi_unregister()

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Feb 16 2012 - 20:02:18 EST


3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@xxxxxx>

commit 2673b4cf5d59c3ee5e0c12f6d734d38770324dc4 upstream.

While 7a401a972df8e18 ("backing-dev: ensure wakeup_timer is deleted")
addressed the problem of the bdi being freed with a queued wakeup
timer, there are other races that could happen if the wakeup timer
expires after/during bdi_unregister(), before bdi_destroy() is called.

wakeup_timer_fn() could attempt to wakeup a task which has already has
been freed, or could access a NULL bdi->dev via the wake_forker_thread
tracepoint.

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Chanho Min <chanho.min@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
mm/backing-dev.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static void wakeup_timer_fn(unsigned lon
if (bdi->wb.task) {
trace_writeback_wake_thread(bdi);
wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task);
- } else {
+ } else if (bdi->dev) {
/*
* When bdi tasks are inactive for long time, they are killed.
* In this case we have to wake-up the forker thread which
@@ -584,6 +584,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_register_dev);
*/
static void bdi_wb_shutdown(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
if (!bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi))
return;

@@ -604,9 +606,14 @@ static void bdi_wb_shutdown(struct backi
* unfreeze of the thread before calling kthread_stop(), otherwise
* it would never exet if it is currently stuck in the refrigerator.
*/
- if (bdi->wb.task) {
- thaw_process(bdi->wb.task);
- kthread_stop(bdi->wb.task);
+ spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+ task = bdi->wb.task;
+ bdi->wb.task = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+
+ if (task) {
+ thaw_process(task);
+ kthread_stop(task);
}
}

@@ -627,7 +634,9 @@ static void bdi_prune_sb(struct backing_

void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
- if (bdi->dev) {
+ struct device *dev = bdi->dev;
+
+ if (dev) {
bdi_set_min_ratio(bdi, 0);
trace_writeback_bdi_unregister(bdi);
bdi_prune_sb(bdi);
@@ -636,8 +645,12 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_i
if (!bdi_cap_flush_forker(bdi))
bdi_wb_shutdown(bdi);
bdi_debug_unregister(bdi);
- device_unregister(bdi->dev);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
bdi->dev = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+
+ device_unregister(dev);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_unregister);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/