Re: [PATCH 11/20] pinctrl: Downgrade pinctrl_get warning when nomaps are found

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:51:55PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This may be perfectly legitimate. An IP block may get re-used
> > across SoCs. Not all of those SoCs may need pinmux settings for the
> > IP block, e.g. if one SoC dedicates pins to that function but
> > another doesn't. The driver won't know this, and will always
> > attempt to set up the pinmux. The mapping table defines whether any
> > HW programming is actually needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is equivalent to providing dummy pincontrollers as was on my
> TODO for a while admittedly.
> 
> For consistency with regulators it would maybe be better to have
> optional dummy pin controllers but after thinking a bit about it
> I think this is more helpful, so I applied it anyway.
> 
> However I would invite more opinions...
> 
I do not have an opinion on how we do it, and my opinion is just we
need to have it.  So, 

Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/