Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] ARM: at91/at91x40: remove use of at91_sys_read/write

[Arnd Bergmann]

Hi Nicolas and Jean-Christophe,

On Wednesday 22 February 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void at91x40_idle(void)
>          * Disable the processor clock.  The processor will be automatically
>          * re-enabled by an interrupt or by a reset.
>          */
> -       at91_sys_write(AT91_PS_CR, AT91_PS_CR_CPU);
> +       __raw_writel(AT91_PS_CR_CPU, AT91_PS_CR);
>         cpu_do_idle();
>  }

How about making this writel_relaxed in the process?
I would like to see the use of __raw_*() get reduced in code that gets
touched. In most cases writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed is the correct
accessor function instead.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/