Re: perf_guest default bug
From: David Ahern
Date: Sat Mar 03 2012 - 10:29:26 EST
Right. And Ingo committed the kernel side patch. I can only recall those 3 fixes at the moment (first sips into the first cup of coffee :-)).
David
Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Em Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:04:05AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:00:01PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
>> > Similar to my last email, this patch is not in urgent trees or
>> > Linus' yet the problem exists in Linus' tree:
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/17/82
>> >
>> > $ /tmp/pbuild/perf record -a -- sleep 1
>> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.319 MB perf.data (~13935 samples) ]
>> > Segmentation fault
>> >
>> > Root cause is the perf_guest setting.
>> >
>> > $ /tmp/pbuild/perf --version
>> > perf version 3.3.rc5.60.g203738
>>
>> This one was tricky, IIRC, weren't follow up patches needed to plug some
>> extra problems?
>
>Yeah, just trying cherry picking it and trying it on an RHEL6.2 kernel
>and it didn't work because older kernels don't have
>attr.exclude_{guest,host}, so I had to also cherrypick:
>
>[acme@sandy linux]$ git cherry-pick
>0c9781280fb672ca09c997df3f14ba506bbdb977
>Finished one cherry-pick.
>[perf/urgent b5f81a4] perf tools: Handle kernels that don't support attr.exclude_{guest,host}
>
>- Arnaldo
N§²æìr¸yúèØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^)Þ{.nÇ+·¥{±êçzX§¶¡Ü}©²ÆzÚ&j:+v¨¾«êçzZ+Ê+zf£¢·h§~Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?¨èÚ&¢)ßfù^jÇy§m
á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®åi