Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] clk: basic clock hardware types
From: Turquette, Mike
Date: Sun Mar 04 2012 - 19:15:25 EST
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +#define DEFINE_CLK_GATE(_name, _parent_name, _parent_ptr, \
>> + _flags, _reg, _bit_idx, \
>> + _gate_flags, _lock) \
>> + static struct clk _name; \
>> + static char *_name##_parent_names[] = { \
>> + _parent_name, \
>> + }; \
>> + static struct clk *_name##_parents[] = { \
>> + _parent_ptr, \
>> + }; \
>> + static struct clk_gate _name##_hw = { \
>> + .hw = { \
>> + .clk = &_name, \
>> + }, \
>> + .reg = _reg, \
>> + .bit_idx = _bit_idx, \
>> + .flags = _gate_flags \
>> + .lock = _lock, \
>> + }; \
>> + static struct clk _name = { \
>> + .name = #_name, \
>> + .ops = &clk_gate_ops, \
>> + .hw = &_name##_hw.hw, \
>> + .parent_names = _name##_parent_names, \
>> + .num_parents = \
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(_name##parent_names), \
>
> Hi Mike
>
> This should be _name##_parent_names, i.e. you are missing a _.
>
> With this and the previous change, i get something which at least
> compiles...
The gate clock is the only type of the basic clocks that I do not
(currently) use in my OMAP port and it's test coverage has suffered as
a result. My bad.
Thanks for the review and the patch in the separate thread. I'll take
the changes in.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Andrew
¢éì¹»®&Þ~º&¶¬?+-±éݶ¥?w®?Ë?±Êâméb?ìdz¹Þ?)í?æèw*jg¬±¨¶????Ý¢j/?êäz¹Þ??à2?Þ?¨èÚ&¢)ß¡«a¶Úþø®G«?éh®æj:+v?¨?wè?Ù¥>W?±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶?ÿÃ-»+?ùd?_