Re: [RFC] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new mm_struct::exe_file v3

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:03:13PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> How about "file_is_exec" instead, since it doesn't (and likely
> shouldn't) include the inode_permission(..., EXEC)? I'd like other
> people's thoughts on this since maybe it's not needed and I instead
> have accidentally derailed this patch with useless bike shedding.
> 

Yup. Anyway, I'm leaving the former mm_struct::exe_file patch with
EXEC test opencoded so we can do everything on top then.

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/