Re: [PATCH] x86: use enum instead of literals for trap values

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 19:28 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:21:52AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I have to admit personally to prefer something like X86_XCP_XX where XX
> > > is the two-letter code that the Intel documentation uses for that trap,
> > > i.e. #GP, #BR, #MC and so on.
> > 
> > We need a single person to decide on this bike shed color. :) If the
> > list of enum names can be agreed on, I'll be happy to do the
> > search/replace for it.
> 
> Well,
> 
> here are my 2¢: I agree with hpa because
> 
> a) it maps the CPU vendor documentation
> b) it is nicely short

I agree too, except where does "XCP" come from? Is it short for
"exception"? Doing a search on "XCP Intel" gives me hits on Armari XCP
an "XCP server". Perhaps to keep in line with the documentation, should
it be:

X86_VEC_XX?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/