Hello Stephen,
Yes, your resolution looks correct to me.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell<sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Rob,
Today's linux-next merge of the cpuidle-cons tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c between commit 00482a4078f4 ("ARM: at91:
implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle") from the arm-soc tree and
commit 7a1f6e72dce1 ("ARM: at91: Consolidate time keeping and irq
enable") from the cpuidle-cons tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
index 555d956,d40b3f3..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
@@@ -37,23 -33,15 +33,8 @@@ static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuid
struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
int index)
{
- struct timeval before, after;
- int idle_time;
-
- local_irq_disable();
- do_gettimeofday(&before);
- if (index == 0)
- /* Wait for interrupt state */
- cpu_do_idle();
- else if (index == 1)
- at91_standby();
- u32 saved_lpr;
-
- __asm__("b 1f; .align 5; 1:\n"
- " mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4"); /* drain write buffer */
-
- saved_lpr = sdram_selfrefresh_enable();
- cpu_do_idle();
- sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr);
++ at91_standby();
- do_gettimeofday(&after);
- local_irq_enable();
- idle_time = (after.tv_sec - before.tv_sec) * USEC_PER_SEC +
- (after.tv_usec - before.tv_usec);
-
- dev->last_residency = idle_time;
return index;
}