Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: care sd_dma_address/len in dmaengine_prep_slave_single()

[Lars-Peter Clausen]

On 03/09/2012 01:18 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Lars
> 
>> On 01/31/2012 02:13 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>>> dmaengine_prep_slave_single() is helper macro of dmaengine.
>>> But it doesn't have sg_dma_address/len() settings which are required.
>>> And it used void *buf in parameter, but it should be dma_addr_t.
>>> This patch fixes up it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any news regarding this patch? The dmaengine_prep_slave_single in upstream
>> is not really usable as it is right now.
> 
> Sorry. I have no news/update for this.
> I'm not good at IOMMU which was pointed by Russell.
> 
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto


Well, he pointed out a minor and easy to fix flaw with the patch. But if you
don't want to resend the patch is it OK for you, if I resend the patch with the
flaw fixed? And is it OK, if I keep your Signed-off-by on that patch?

Thanks,
- Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/