[V2 PATCH 3/3] module: dd missing synchronize_sched()

From: Cong Wang
Date: Sun Mar 11 2012 - 06:54:49 EST


I am not sure about this patch, my understanding is that
after every list del/add, we should call synchronize_sched()
to mark the end of update. Does this patch make sense?

Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/module.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index db402a8..e1d8fae 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1785,6 +1785,7 @@ static void free_module(struct module *mod)
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
stop_machine(__unlink_module, mod, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+ synchronize_sched();
mod_sysfs_teardown(mod);

/* Remove dynamic debug info */
@@ -2935,6 +2936,7 @@ static struct module *load_module(void __user *umod,
module_bug_finalize(info.hdr, info.sechdrs, mod);
list_add_rcu(&mod->list, &modules);
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+ synchronize_sched();

/* Module is ready to execute: parsing args may do that. */
err = parse_args(mod->name, mod->args, mod->kp, mod->num_kp, NULL);
--
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/