Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 16:38 Sat 10 Mar     , Alan Ott wrote:
> Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which
> chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done
> by Arnd Bergmann.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig |   11 +++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
>  config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
>  	bool
>  
> +config AT91_HAS_PATA
> +	bool
what is the need for this?

As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/