Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv4: Standardize prefixes for messagelogging
From: Joe Perches
Date: Mon Mar 12 2012 - 20:35:53 EST
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 17:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:03:32 -0700
> > Add #define pr_fmt(fmt) as appropriate.
> > Add "IPv4: ", "TCP: ", and "IPsec: " to appropriate files.
> > Standardize on "UDPLite: " for appropriate uses.
> > Some prefixes were previously "UDPLITE: " and "UDP-Lite: ".
[]
> Looks good, and applied,
OK. I'll submit a similar change for net/ipv6 in awhile.
> but I left out this hunk:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipcomp.c b/net/ipv4/ipcomp.c
> > index 63b64c4..56d6768 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ipcomp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ipcomp.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > * - Compression stats.
> > * - Adaptive compression.
> > */
> > +
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
>
> As it seemed accidental, if not gratuitous.
It wasn't accidental, though I could have mentioned it
in the changelog. Most files have a blank line between
an initial block commment and the first #include.
I just do that by habit when looking if a file could
benefit from a #define pr_fmt.
I added a similar blank line to udplite.c, but there
I also added pr_fmt.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/