Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: Avoid checking huge page mappings in get_dirty_log()

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/13/2012 11:20 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > It occurs to me that we should write-protect huge page tables, since it
> > makes write protection much faster (we make up for this later at write
> > fault time, but that might not occur, and even if it does we reduce
> > guest jitter).  In fact I once proposed a more involved variant, called
>
> Do you mean protecting huge page tables when we start logging and dropping
> them, one by one, at the time of write fault?

Yes.  Even more generally, protecting PML4Es, then at fault time
un-protecting the faulting PML4E and write-protecting all underlying
PDPEs except the one for the faulting address, and similarly for PDEs
and PTEs.

> If so, we do not need to change get_dirty_log() implementation.
> Changing kvm_mmu_remove_write_access() and fault handler seems to be enough.
>
> > O(1) write protection, in which we write-protect the topmost page table
> > only and only un-write-protect the paths that fault.
>
> > That can be done later however and shouldn't affect this patchset.
>
> I have some additional patches to optimize rmap handling which seems to
> improve get_dirty_log() about 10% in the worst case.

Great, looking forward.

> After that, I want to take some time to prepare for further developments
> because my current test tools are not enough now.
>

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/