Re: [PATCH 06/25] vfs: add i_op->atomic_create()

[Miklos Szeredi]

Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> Good point.  Yes, ->create is probably worth getting rid of.  Mkdir, I'm
>>> not so sure, but I'll look at what filesystems are doing.
>>
>> Btw, is there any good reason to keep ->atomic_open and ->atomic_create
>> separate?  It seems like the instances in general share code anyway.
>
> ->atomic_open is called before lookup, ->atomic_create after lookup.
>
> How would we differentiate between the two if they were common?  We
> could have a filesystem flag, but for example CEPH does weird things
> like using ->atomic_open for !O_CREAT and ->atomic_create for O_CREAT.

Or let the filesystem do the lookup in ->atomic_open if it wants (and
pass the need_lookup flag to the filesystem).

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/