Re: [PATCH] PCI: Device specific reset function
From: Tadeusz Struk
Date: Wed Mar 14 2012 - 04:47:18 EST
On 13/03/12 02:42, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 16:55 +0000, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
>> I have a use case where I need to cleanup resource allocated for Virtual
>> Functions after a guest OS that used it crashed. This cleanup needs to
>> be done before the VF is being FLRed. The only possible way to do this
>> seems to be by using pci_dev_specific_reset() function.
>> This patch adds specific reset function to the pci_driver struct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 4 ++++
>> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> index 6476547..13d224b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> @@ -3081,8 +3081,12 @@ static const struct pci_dev_reset_methods pci_dev_reset_methods[] = {
>>
>> int pci_dev_specific_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
>> {
>> + struct pci_driver *drv = dev->driver;
>> const struct pci_dev_reset_methods *i;
>>
>> + if (drv && drv->reset)
>> + return drv->reset(dev, probe);
>> +
>
> Isn't this exactly what the below code is for (pci_dev_reset_methods)?
> In the case of KVM device assignment, the device should be reset via
> this path if the guest crashes, but it may or may not be attached to
> pci-stub at the time. I assume you're not adding a reset handler to
> pci-stub, so we'll pass through here and use FLR, violating the premise
> of the patch. Thanks,
>
> Alex
Hi,
The reset handler supposed to be in the "real" driver not in the pci-stub.
You are right, at this stage the VF can still be assigned to the pci-stub, which makes it useless in my case.
I think the only option for me will be to go with the v2 of the patch.
I'll do a bit more testing to make sure this is the case and resend the v2.
Thanks,
Tadeusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/