Re: [PATCH v15 11/13] ptrace,seccomp: Add PTRACE_SECCOMP support

[Will Drewry]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On Thu, March 15, 2012 04:12, Will Drewry wrote:
>> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@
>>  #define PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE      5
>>  #define PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT    6
>>  #define PTRACE_EVENT_STOP    7
>> +#define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 8
>>
>>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>>
>> @@ -101,8 +103,9 @@
>>  #define PT_TRACE_EXEC                PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC)
>>  #define PT_TRACE_VFORK_DONE  PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE)
>>  #define PT_TRACE_EXIT                PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT)
>> +#define PT_TRACE_SECCOMP     PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)
>>
>> -#define PT_TRACE_MASK        0x000003f4
>> +#define PT_TRACE_MASK        0x00000ff4
>
> Did you miss this bit?

Kinda.  I'll go ahead and switch it to 0xbf4, but PT_TRACE_MASK
doesn't exist in linux-next so this bit disappears on merge.  However,
it is relevant if people are backporting this code, so I'll push a new
rev of it in a bit if I don't get any other comments (or include it in
the next rev if there are comments).

Thanks!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/