[PATCH 0/2] i2c: Don't assume bus nr 0 if none was specified

From: Karol Lewandowski
Date: Fri Mar 16 2012 - 08:19:10 EST


Hi,

i2c controller drivers used to assume bus number 0 when none (-1) was specified.

This worked on non-device tree systems, where one could explicitly specify
bus number via platform data. On DT-enabled systems bus number is always -1.

Some drivers assume bus number 0 when -1 is specified. This patchset kills
this logic and switches to dynamic bus allocation (default when -1 is provided[1]).

[ I've found out this when I've tried to instantiate more than one i2c-gpio
instance on DT-enabled system. I've, hopefully, fixed few other drivers too. ]

[1] Introduced by Grant Likely in 488bf314b ("i2c: Allow i2c_add_numbered_adapter()
to assign a bus id")

Karol Lewandowski (2):
i2c-pxa: Drop leftover comment
i2c: Dynamically assign adapter id if it wasn't explictly specified

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c | 7 +------
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c | 2 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 2 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 5 -----
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-versatile.c | 9 ++-------
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--
1.7.9

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/