RE: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call_function and CPU booting
From: Liu, Chuansheng
Date: Sun Mar 18 2012 - 20:58:22 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 5:49 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yanmin Zhang; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call_function and CPU booting
>
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 06:24 +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
>
> > Based on your patch, I did a little modification, how do you think of that?
>
> > --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> > @@ -640,8 +640,10 @@ void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool
> > present)
> >
> > void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online) {
> > - if (online)
> > + if (online) {
> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(cpu_online_bits));
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(cpu_active_bits));
> > + }
> > else
> > cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(cpu_online_bits));
> > }
>
> I'm thinking this lacks rationale. What was wrong, Why does this fix it.
> If you can't answer that stop tinkering and start thinking.
Your patch advance the setting active bit before online setting, that will cause
an warning error, I just move the setting active bit after setting online setting, it can fix
the warning error, and it can fix the race issue between smp_call_function and CPU booting.
I have tested it by some stress tests.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/