Re: [PATCH -V4 04/10] memcg: Add HugeTLB extension

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Mon Mar 19 2012 - 03:02:49 EST


(2012/03/19 15:52), Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:38:38 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> (2012/03/17 2:39), Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This patch implements a memcg extension that allows us to control
>>> HugeTLB allocations via memory controller.
>>>
>>
>>
>> If you write some details here, it will be helpful for review and
>> seeing log after merge.
>
> Will add more info.
>
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 1 +
>>> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 42 +++++++++++++
>>> init/Kconfig | 8 +++
>>> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
>>> mm/memcontrol.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> ....
>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTLR_HUGETLB
>>> +static bool mem_cgroup_have_hugetlb_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>> +{
>>> + int idx;
>>> + for (idx = 0; idx < hugetlb_max_hstate; idx++) {
>>> + if (memcg->hugepage[idx].usage > 0)
>>> + return 1;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> Please use res_counter_read_u64() rather than reading the value directly.
>>
>
> The open-coded variant is mostly derived from mem_cgroup_force_empty. I
> have updated the patch to use res_counter_read_u64.
>

Ah, ok. it's(maybe) my bad. I'll schedule a fix.


Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/