[PATCH] mm: forbid lumpy-reclaim in shrink_active_list()

[Konstantin Khlebnikov]

This patch reset reclaim mode in shrink_active_list() to RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE | RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC.
(sync/async sign is used only in shrink_page_list and does not affect shrink_active_list)

Currenly shrink_active_list() sometimes works in lumpy-reclaim mode,
if RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM left over from earlier shrink_inactive_list().
Meanwhile, in age_active_anon() sc->reclaim_mode is totally zero.
So, current behavior is too complex and confusing, all this looks like bug.

In general, shrink_active_list() populate inactive list for next shrink_inactive_list().
Lumpy shring_inactive_list() isolate pages around choosen one from both active and
inactive lists. So, there no reasons for lumpy-isolation in shrink_active_list()

Proposed-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/15/583
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 57d8ef6..ae83ca3 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1690,6 +1690,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 
 	lru_add_drain();
 
+	reset_reclaim_mode(sc);
+
 	if (!sc->may_unmap)
 		isolate_mode |= ISOLATE_UNMAPPED;
 	if (!sc->may_writepage)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/