On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:46:29PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:31 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"<mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I guess the point was that we want a single packetThe whole idea of acking by clearing the bit is unreliable, moving to adiff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.hI would put this in bit 8 (0x100), this way low status byte
index 970d5a2..44a38d6 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
@@ -49,8 +49,10 @@
#define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX 18 /* Control channel RX mode support */
#define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN 19 /* Control channel VLAN filtering */
#define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX_EXTRA 20 /* Extra RX mode control support */
+#define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE 21 /* Guest can send gratituous packet */
#define VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP 1 /* Link is up */
+#define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE 2 /* Announcement is needed */
is RO, high byte is RW.
separate byte just controls the damage.
How about you use bits 8-15 as a counter? It's still theoretically
unreliable if 256 notifications pass before the guest notices, but it's
probably better and clearer than this.
I leave the final call to MST though.
Thanks,
Rusty.
so we don't care if multiple notifications are coalesced
into a single one.
----
How could I marry someone with more hair than me? http://baldalex.org
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html