Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer.  With lots of
> discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
> we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
> not-so-distant future.

Hmm, according to the script, you are the maintainer ;-)

$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> (commit_signer:8/10=80%)
Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:7/10=70%)
Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@xxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/10=40%)
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/10=40%)
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/10=40%)

While I realize that the get_maintainers.pl is not the final word,
you could be the acting cpuidle maintainer for this merge window
and send the pull request.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/