Re: Patch workqueue: create new slab cache instead of hacking
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Mar 21 2012 - 12:09:14 EST
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:12:04AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> How about this instead?
>
> Subject: workqueues: Use new kmem cache to get aligned memory for workqueues
>
> The workqueue logic currently improvises by doing a kmalloc allocation and
> then aligning the object. Create a slab cache for that purpose with the
> proper alignment instead.
>
> Cleans up the code and makes things much simpler. No need anymore to carry
> an additional pointer to the beginning of the kmalloc object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
I don't know. At this point, this is only for singlethread and
unbound workqueues and we don't have too many of them left at this
point. I'd like to avoid creating a slab cache for this. How about
just leaving it be? If we develop other use cases for larger
alignments, let's worry about implementing something common then.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/